From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hovey v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Dec 26, 1957
137 A.2d 208 (Md. 1957)

Opinion

[H.C. No. 53, September Term, 1957.]

Decided December 26, 1957.

HABEAS CORPUS — Arrest Allegedly Irregular. The irregularity of an arrest cannot be inquired into on habeas corpus after conviction. p. 613

HABEAS CORPUS — Search — Legality of. The legality of a search may not be raised on habeas corpus. p. 614

HABEAS CORPUS — Confessions Allegedly Obtained by Threats and Coercion. Questions as to confessions allegedly obtained by threats and coercion may be raised on appeal, but not on habeas corpus. p. 614

HABEAS CORPUS — Time Held Before Trial. The length of time an accused was held before trial goes only to the regularity of the proceedings, and not to the jurisdiction of the trial court, and cannot be raised on habeas corpus. p. 614

HABEAS CORPUS — Unsupported and General Allegations Insufficient. General allegations of unlawful detention, unsupported by proof, are not a basis for release on habeas corpus. p. 614

J.E.B.

Decided December 26, 1957.

Habeas corpus proceeding by John Hovey against the Warden of the Maryland House of Correction. From a refusal of the writ, petitioner applied for leave to appeal.

Application denied, with costs.

Before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.


After Michaelson, J., of the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, denied him a writ of habeas corpus, John Hovey applied to this Court for leave to appeal.

The petitioner was convicted in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County (Smith, J.) of burglary, and was sentenced to five years in the House of Correction.

The petitioner contends (i) that he was arrested without a warrant, (ii) that there was an illegal search of his "lady friend's" apartment, (iii) that he was forced to confess by threats and coercion, (iv) that he was held an unconscionable length of time before a hearing, (v) and, generally, that he ought to be released because it is the only solution to the unlawful detention he is being forced to undergo.

(i) Arrest Without a Warrant. The irregularity of an arrest cannot be inquired into on habeas corpus after conviction. Price v. Warden, 212 Md. 661, 129 A.2d 120.

(ii) Illegal Search. This Court on numerous occasions has held that the legality of a search may not be raised on habeas corpus. Meleganich v. Warden, 213 Md. 648, 132 A.2d 130.

(iii) Confession Obtained by Threats and Coercion. Questions as to confessions thus obtained may be raised on appeal, but not on habeas corpus. Randall v. Warden, 208 Md. 667, 119 A.2d 712.

(iv) Time Held Before Trial. This allegation goes only to the regularity of the proceedings and not the jurisdiction of the trial court, and cannot be raised on habeas corpus. Szukiewicz v. Warden, 213 Md. 636, 131 A.2d 390.

(v) Unsupported and General Allegations. General allegations of unlawful detention unsupported by proof are not a basis for release on habeas corpus.

Some of the allegations set forth in his petition for the writ could have been the subject of an appeal seasonably taken, but they definitely cannot be raised on habeas corpus.

Application denied, with costs.


Summaries of

Hovey v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Dec 26, 1957
137 A.2d 208 (Md. 1957)
Case details for

Hovey v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:HOVEY v . WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Dec 26, 1957

Citations

137 A.2d 208 (Md. 1957)
137 A.2d 208

Citing Cases

Wells v. Maxwell

It is basic that the method of an accused's apprehension cannot be inquired into in a habeas corpus…

Davis v. Warden

Of the remaining ten, four involved arguments of fact and irrelevant points of law. Judge Smith properly…