From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hovey v. Lafarge North America, Inc.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Jan 28, 2008
07-2193 (WJM) (D.N.J. Jan. 28, 2008)

Opinion

07-2193 (WJM).

January 28, 2008


ORDER


A Report and Recommendation was filed on January 14, 2008 recommending that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed with prejudice for failure to comply with the Court's Order directing Plaintiff to obtain new counsel or enter an appearance pro se; and Plaintiff having been served with the Order; and the parties having been given notice that they had ten days within which to object to the Report and Recommendation pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.1(c)(2); and no objection having been received; and the Court having reviewed the Report and Recommendation de novo and agreeing with the analysis and conclusions therein; and for good cause shown,

IT IS on this 28th day of January, 2008, hereby,

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mark Falk is adopted by this Court; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court close this case.


Summaries of

Hovey v. Lafarge North America, Inc.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Jan 28, 2008
07-2193 (WJM) (D.N.J. Jan. 28, 2008)
Case details for

Hovey v. Lafarge North America, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN HOVEY, Plaintiff, v. LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA, INC., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Jan 28, 2008

Citations

07-2193 (WJM) (D.N.J. Jan. 28, 2008)

Citing Cases

Ximuhammad v. Port Auth. of NY & NJ Police Dep't

Poulis, 747 F.2d at 868; Emerson v. Thiel College, 296 F.3d 184, 190 3d Cir. 2002) (applying Poulis factors).…

United States v. $115,032.50 in U.S. Currency

Poulis, 747 F.2d at 868; Emerson v. Thiel College, 296 F.3d 184, 190 (3d Cir. 2002) (applying Poulis…