From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Houze v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 27, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-01484 MCE KJN PS (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-01484 MCE KJN PS

07-27-2012

LAMONT A. HOUZE II, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al. Defendants.


ORDER

Presently before the court is plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. However, plaintiff's recently filed amended application to proceed in forma pauperis is still pending, and the court has not yet screened plaintiff's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), or authorized the service of plaintiff's complaint on any defendant. As no defendant has been served with process, plaintiff's prematurely filed motion for summary judgment is denied without prejudice to re-filing at an appropriate time. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 5) is denied without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Houze v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 27, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-01484 MCE KJN PS (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Houze v. California

Case Details

Full title:LAMONT A. HOUZE II, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 27, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-01484 MCE KJN PS (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2012)