From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Houthoofd v. Law Office of Matthew Reyes

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 4, 2019
SC: 158611 (Mich. Feb. 4, 2019)

Opinion

SC: 158611

02-04-2019

TOD K. HOUTHOOFD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAW OFFICE OF MATTHEW REYES, Defendant-Appellee.


Order

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices COA: 340514
Bay CC: 16-003745-NM

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 24, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 4, 2019

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Houthoofd v. Law Office of Matthew Reyes

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 4, 2019
SC: 158611 (Mich. Feb. 4, 2019)
Case details for

Houthoofd v. Law Office of Matthew Reyes

Case Details

Full title:TOD K. HOUTHOOFD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAW OFFICE OF MATTHEW REYES…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Feb 4, 2019

Citations

SC: 158611 (Mich. Feb. 4, 2019)