Summary
holding that the University of Oregon was entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity
Summary of this case from Knight v. Portland State Univ.Opinion
Civil No. 02-6288-TC.
February 25, 2004
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on February 4, 2004. The matter is now before me.See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review.Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation. Defendants' FRCP 12 motion to dismiss plaintiff's second amended complaint in part (#31) is denied as to plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claim alleged in claim two and allowed in all other respects.
IT IS SO ORDERED.