Houston v. State

Full title: Damon J. Houston, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Date published: Sep 8, 2015

469 S.W.3d 503 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

2015-09-8

Damon J. Houston, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, 1322–CC00483, Honorable Thomas C. Grady, Judge. Srikant Chigurupati, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Adam Rowley, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, 1322–CC00483, Honorable Thomas C. Grady, Judge.

Srikant Chigurupati, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Adam Rowley, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent.
Before: Philip M. Hess P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Damon Houston appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2015).