From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Houston v. Rogers

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 1, 2006
No. CIV S-03-1107 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-03-1107 LKK KJM P.

August 1, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff a California prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 2, 2006, the court recommended that this action be stayed, based on a motion brought by defendants, because plaintiff had been found to be incompetent to stand trial in a California criminal matter. Defendants have now informed the court that prior to the issuance of the findings and recommendations plaintiff was found competent to stand trial and entered a guilty plea. Plaintiff has not responded to defendants' latest filing.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The court's June 2, 2006 findings and recommendations are vacated;

2. Defendants' October 31, 2005 motion for a stay is denied as moot;

3. The dates established in the court's October 12, 2005 scheduling order are vacated; and

4. Within twenty days of this order, the parties shall inform the court if and why further discovery is appropriate.


Summaries of

Houston v. Rogers

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 1, 2006
No. CIV S-03-1107 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2006)
Case details for

Houston v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:ALAMAR CYRIL HOUSTON, Plaintiff, v. E. ROGERS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 1, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-03-1107 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2006)