From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Houston v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 16, 2007
No. CIV S-04-1923 RRB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-1923 RRB EFB P.

April 16, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner prosecuting this civil rights action without counsel. Pursuant to the July 28, 2006, schedule, plaintiff's pretrial statement was due March 23, 2007, defendants' pretrial statement was due April 6, 2007, pretrial conference is set for April 13, 2007, and trial is set for July 9, 2007. However, because defendants' motion for summary judgment is currently pending, the above dates are vacated. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b).

On February 23, 2007, defendants moved for a protective order, seeking to have documents central to their motion for summary judgment kept under seal for a period of seventy-five years in order to ensure the safety of the prisoners involved. Good cause appearing, that request is be granted.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Houston v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 16, 2007
No. CIV S-04-1923 RRB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2007)
Case details for

Houston v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:ALAMAR CYRIL HOUSTON, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS L. CAREY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 16, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-04-1923 RRB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2007)