From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Houston v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 17, 2007
No. CIV S-04-1923 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-1923 GEB EFB P.

October 17, 2007


ORDER


On May 21, 2007, Findings and Recommendations were filed recommending that this action be dismissed. On September 6, 2007, the assigned district judge adopted that recommendation and the case was dismissed. Judgment was entered accordingly. Notwithstanding that judgment closing this case, plaintiff filed on September 24, 2007, a motion to dismiss. That motion dismiss is superfluous and is denied.

The court notes that it will issue no response to future filings by plaintiff in this action not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Houston v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 17, 2007
No. CIV S-04-1923 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2007)
Case details for

Houston v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:ALAMAR CYRIL HOUSTON, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS L. CAREY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 17, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-04-1923 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2007)