From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Housh v. Rackley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 11, 2019
No. 2:18-cv-2723 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2019)

Opinion

No. 2:18-cv-2723 WBS CKD P

06-11-2019

CARLOS C. HOUSH, Plaintiff, v. RONALD RACKLEY, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed April 30, 2019, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time ///// ///// waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: June 11, 2019

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1
hous2723.fta


Summaries of

Housh v. Rackley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 11, 2019
No. 2:18-cv-2723 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2019)
Case details for

Housh v. Rackley

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS C. HOUSH, Plaintiff, v. RONALD RACKLEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 11, 2019

Citations

No. 2:18-cv-2723 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 11, 2019)