From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Houseman v. N. Y. Central and Hudson River R.R

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1915
169 App. Div. 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)

Opinion

May, 1915.


Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Held, that while the moving affidavits apparently do not state facts upon which an order for an open commission should have been granted, yet, in view of the laches of the defendant and the correspondence between the attorneys for the respective parties read upon the application herein, and the further fact that the commissions have been executed, the order should be affirmed. All concurred.


Summaries of

Houseman v. N. Y. Central and Hudson River R.R

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1915
169 App. Div. 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Case details for

Houseman v. N. Y. Central and Hudson River R.R

Case Details

Full title:George A. Houseman, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 1, 1915

Citations

169 App. Div. 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)