Opinion
2:21-cv-00499-JAD-DJA
11-10-2022
Matthew Travis Houston, Plaintiff, v. Golden Entertainment, et al. Defendants.
ORDER
DANIEL J. ALBREGTS, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 36) and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 37). However, Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel contains numerous pages that appear unrelated and make little sense. And Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis contains delusional answers to questions. He refers the Court to other cases when asked where he was previously employed. (ECF No. 37 at 1). And when asked to list persons dependent on him for support, Plaintiff answered “[i]t is NOT a delusion that Foundation for LVMPD, the Democrapps and Daniel J. Albreg[]ts rely on (me) the people for support. Still enemies...” (Id. at 2). Moreover, the Court has already recommended dismissal of this case for Plaintiff's repeated failure to file a fully complete and intelligible application. (ECF No. 32).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 36) is denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 37) is denied.