From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Houk v. State

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Feb 8, 2017
898 N.W.2d 202 (Iowa Ct. App. 2017)

Summary

finding the defendant was not prejudiced by the identical kidnapping instruction, because "the instructions as a whole properly conveyed the elements of the crime"

Summary of this case from State v. Sisco

Opinion

No. 15-1976

02-08-2017

Eric Earl HOUK, Applicant-Appellant, v. STATE of Iowa, Respondent-Appellee.

Stephen P. Dowil of Booth Law Firm, Osceola, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Sheryl A. Soich, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee State.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Houk v. State

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Feb 8, 2017
898 N.W.2d 202 (Iowa Ct. App. 2017)

finding the defendant was not prejudiced by the identical kidnapping instruction, because "the instructions as a whole properly conveyed the elements of the crime"

Summary of this case from State v. Sisco
Case details for

Houk v. State

Case Details

Full title:Eric Earl HOUK, Applicant-Appellant, v. STATE of Iowa, Respondent-Appellee.

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Feb 8, 2017

Citations

898 N.W.2d 202 (Iowa Ct. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

State v. Sisco

Our court found the phrase, "as a result of the confinement or removal," and the statutory language,…