From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Houghton v. Glant

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 29, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-188 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 29, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-188.

June 29, 2011


ORDER


AND NOW, this 29th day of June, 2011, after the petitioner, Matthew D. Houghton, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties a period of time after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the petition and the record and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 14), which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by petitioner Matthew D. Houghton (Ecf No. 4) is dismissed and, because reasonable jurists could not conclude that a basis for appeal exists, and a certificate of appealability is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure if the petitioner desires to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Houghton v. Glant

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 29, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-188 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Houghton v. Glant

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW D. HOUGHTON, Petitioner, v. STEVEN GLANT, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 29, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-188 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 29, 2011)