From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Houghtalen v. Norstar Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 25, 1993
191 A.D.2d 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

March 25, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.).


Plaintiffs' cross motion to amend the caption so as to reflect the true name of defendant, to wit Francesco Monti, should have been granted, there being evidence that he was properly served and suffered no prejudice as a result of the misnomer (CPLR 305 [c]; Ober v. Rye Town Hilton, 159 A.D.2d 16, 21). The cross motion should also have been granted to dismiss defendants' affirmative defense of lack of jurisdiction, there being sufficient evidence in the record to establish that both defendants were properly served.

Concerning venue, defendant Norstar, the owner of the allegedly negligent vehicle, submitted documentation from the New York State Banking Department demonstrating that its principal place of business was in Nassau County at the time of the accident, and in Suffolk County at the time the action was commenced. Because defendant Norstar must be deemed a corporation under Banking Law § 2 (1) and (10) plaintiffs' designation of New York County as the place of trial was improper (CPLR 503 [c]; 510 [1]).

We have considered plaintiffs' other arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Ross, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Houghtalen v. Norstar Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 25, 1993
191 A.D.2d 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Houghtalen v. Norstar Bank

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD P. HOUGHTALEN, JR., et al., Appellants, v. NORSTAR BANK et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 25, 1993

Citations

191 A.D.2d 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
595 N.Y.S.2d 408

Citing Cases

Tsoumpas 1105 Lexington Equities, LLC v. 1109 Lexington Ave. LLC

Unlike Matter of Tory Burch LLC v. Moskowitz , 146 A.D.3d 528, 43 N.Y.S.3d 901 (1st Dept. 2017), petitioner…

Ibonic Holdings, LLC v. Vessix, Inc.

This branch of plaintiff's motion is granted, as these errors were minor irregularities which did not result…