applying Janetka in finding that conviction for speeding charge did not bar a malicious prosecution claim premised on acquittal of charges for resisting arrest and attempted escape
Summary of this case from Dunham v. City of N.Y.No. 91-7312.
September 19, 1991.
Appeal from S.D.N.Y., 757 F.Supp. 283.
Decisions without Published Opinions Affirmed.
applying Janetka in finding that conviction for speeding charge did not bar a malicious prosecution claim premised on acquittal of charges for resisting arrest and attempted escape
Summary of this case from Dunham v. City of N.Y.Full title:Hough v. Merrill Lynch
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Date published: Sep 19, 1991
On September 25, 1991, the Second Circuit affirmed his conviction, finding that: (1) the Court properly…
Wallikas v. Harderan indefinite period of time, that spurious and unrebutted charges against her might remain on the record,…