Opinion
January, 1927.
Present — Dowling, P.J., Merrell, Martin, O'Malley and Proskauer, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff, respondent. No opinion.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Hough v. Electric Automobile Sales Corporation
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1927
219 App. Div. 713 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Summaries of
Hough v. Electric Automobile Sales Corporation
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1927
219 App. Div. 713 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for
Hough v. Electric Automobile Sales Corporation
Case Details
Full title:SAMUEL F. HOUGH, Respondent, v. ELECTRIC AUTOMOBILE SALES CORPORATION…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Jan 1, 1927
Citations
219 App. Div. 713 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Citing Cases
Robb v. St. Louis Public Service Co.
Said instruction authorized a verdict for defendant, if the driver operated his automobile so as to pass the…
Flach v. BallHe was manifestly qualified, well qualified, to give an opinion. State v. Watson, 216 Mo. 420; Aston v. St.…