From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Houff v. Blackletter

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Aug 13, 2009
Civ. No. 06-1328-CL (D. Or. Aug. 13, 2009)

Opinion

Civ. No. 06-1328-CL.

August 13, 2009


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Petitioner has filed objections, and I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F. 2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).

I find no error in the Report and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (57) is adopted. The petition (2) is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Houff v. Blackletter

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Aug 13, 2009
Civ. No. 06-1328-CL (D. Or. Aug. 13, 2009)
Case details for

Houff v. Blackletter

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE THOMAS HOUFF, Petitioner, v. SHARON BLACKLETTER, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Aug 13, 2009

Citations

Civ. No. 06-1328-CL (D. Or. Aug. 13, 2009)

Citing Cases

Reece v. Davis

Because Reece "has already been convicted" of kidnapping and robbery, "[d]ouble jeopardy considerations would…