From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hotham v. Ouest Diagnostics Inc.

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Jan 18, 2006
Civil No. 05-cv-464-JM (D.N.H. Jan. 18, 2006)

Opinion

Civil No. 05-cv-464-JM.

January 18, 2006


ORDER


All of the judges in this district were recused from presiding over this case. Accordingly, the case was transferred to the District of Maine.

The recusal of all of the judges on this court gives rise to an "emergency" with respect to the transferred case as that term is used in 28 U.S.C. § 636(f). I therefore concur in the assignment of a Magistrate Judge from the transferee district to perform the duties specified in 28 U.S.C. § 636(a)-(c).

SO ORDERED.

Concurring Order

I concur that an emergency exists as specified above and that for the duration of this case Magistrate Judge _____________ is assigned to perform such duties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(a)-(c) as may be assigned to him by the District Judge to whom this case is assigned.


Summaries of

Hotham v. Ouest Diagnostics Inc.

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Jan 18, 2006
Civil No. 05-cv-464-JM (D.N.H. Jan. 18, 2006)
Case details for

Hotham v. Ouest Diagnostics Inc.

Case Details

Full title:David Hotham, Plaintiffs v. Ouest Diagnostics. Inc., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. New Hampshire

Date published: Jan 18, 2006

Citations

Civil No. 05-cv-464-JM (D.N.H. Jan. 18, 2006)