From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoth v. Hoth

Supreme Court of Washington.
Apr 7, 2021
197 Wash. 2d 1004 (Wash. 2021)

Opinion

No. 99312-2

04-07-2021

Donald HOTH, Petitioner, v. Edward HOTH, Respondent.


ORDER

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice González and Justices Madsen, Stephens, Yu, and Whitener (Justice Johnson sat for Justice Madsen), considered at its April 6, 2021, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied and the Respondent's request for attorney fees for filing an answer to the petition for review is granted. The Respondent is awarded reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to RAP 18.1(j). The amount of the attorney fees and expenses will be determined by the Supreme Court Clerk pursuant to RAP 18.1. Pursuant to RAP 18.1(d), the Respondent should file an affidavit with the Clerk of the Washington State Supreme Court.

For the Court

/s/ González, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

Hoth v. Hoth

Supreme Court of Washington.
Apr 7, 2021
197 Wash. 2d 1004 (Wash. 2021)
Case details for

Hoth v. Hoth

Case Details

Full title:Donald HOTH, Petitioner, v. Edward HOTH, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Apr 7, 2021

Citations

197 Wash. 2d 1004 (Wash. 2021)
483 P.3d 778