From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hotel 237, LLC v. G.M. Canmar Residence Corp.

Supreme Court, New York County
May 6, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 31506 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022)

Opinion

Index No. 657772/2019 Motion Seq. No. 002

05-06-2022

HOTEL 237, LLC, Plaintiff, v. G.M. CANMAR RESIDENCE CORP., Defendant.


Unpublished Opinion

MOTION DATE 05/04/2022

DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION

DEBRA JAMES, J.S.C.

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 002) 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 were read on this motion to/for PENDENTE LITE.

ORDER

Upon the foregoing documents, it is

ORDERED that, to the extent that it seeks use and occupancy pendente lite, the motion of defendant is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that plaintiff Hotel 237, LLC shall make the following payments of use and occupancy to defendant G.M. Canmar Residence Corp.: a) commencing with the month of June 2022 and each month thereafter during the pendency of the above-captioned action, plaintiff Hotel 237, LLC shall pay use and occupancy as and when due at the base rent reserved in the Lease dated January 1, 2010, as amended on January 4, 2010; and b) plaintiff Hotel 237, LLC shall pay to defendant G.M. Canmar Residence Corp. use and occupancy at the base rent reserved in the Lease dated January 1, 2010, as amended on January 4, 2010, from December 1, 2019 through May 31, 2022, which payments of past use and occupancy pursuant to this sub-paragraph (b) shall be made within sixty (60) days after service of a copy of this order with notice of entry; and it is further, ORDERED that with respect to the foregoing relief, this Order shall be severed, entered, and is effective, forthwith; and it is further

ORDERED that, plaintiff's cross motion, to the extent that it seeks a protective order and sanctions is denied; and it is further

ORDERED that defendant's motion, to the extent that it seeks to compel discovery, is resolved in accordance with accords reached by counselors for both parties at the virtual preliminary conference held in lieu of oral argument; and it is further

ORDERED that counsel shall submit a proposed preliminary discovery compliance conference order that sets forth such accords, which proposed preliminary order shall be transmitted to SFC-Part59@nycourts.gov and to SFC-Part59-Clerk@nycourts.gov and posted on NYSCEF no later than May 18, 2022; and it is further

ORDERED that such "submit order" shall include a directive that counsel transmit to SFC-Part59@nycourts.gov and to SFC-Part59-Clerk@nycourts.gov and post on NYSCEF a proposed discovery compliance conference order or competing proposed discovery compliance conference order(s) at least two days before August 18, 2022, 11 AM, on which date counsel shall appear via Microsoft Teams, unless such appearance be waived by the court.

DECISION

To the extent that defendant seeks to compel plaintiff to appear for depositions, a preliminary conference must be (and has now been) held. See 22 NYCRR § 202.8(f) and Rules of the Justices of New York County Supreme Court, Civil Branch, 111.5(a). Moreover, as set forth in the Rules of the undersigned, "Motions to compel compliance with discovery order or discovery demands are generally disfavored by this court." In that regard, as to plaintiff's motion for a protective order and sanctions, neither is warranted.

As for defendant's motion seeking an order directing plaintiff to pay past and ongoing use and occupancy pendente lite, the court has further deliberated and determined that the application of the preliminary injunction standard to such request would be improper. This court finds that an order directing plaintiff to pay past and ongoing use and occupancy pendente lite to defendant is the proper exercise of this court's broad discretion in such regard. See 43rd Street Deli, Inc. v Paramount Leasehold, L.P., 107 A.D.3d 501 (1st Dept 2013) .


Summaries of

Hotel 237, LLC v. G.M. Canmar Residence Corp.

Supreme Court, New York County
May 6, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 31506 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022)
Case details for

Hotel 237, LLC v. G.M. Canmar Residence Corp.

Case Details

Full title:HOTEL 237, LLC, Plaintiff, v. G.M. CANMAR RESIDENCE CORP., Defendant.

Court:Supreme Court, New York County

Date published: May 6, 2022

Citations

2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 31506 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022)