From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hotchkiss v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Michigan
Nov 1, 2022
No. 362370 (Mich. Ct. App. Nov. 1, 2022)

Opinion

362370

11-01-2022

Frances Hotchkiss v. Dionte Moore


LC No. 21-110135-DC

Christopher M. Murray Presiding Judge Kirsten Frank Kelly Thomas C. Cameron Judges

ORDER

Being informed that the recordings necessary to produce the transcripts have been located, the Court orders that the motion to vacate the order on appeal or remand for re-creation of the record is DENIED. The motion to reply to the answer to the motion to vacate or remand is GRANTED.

Within 14 days after this order is entered, appellant shall secure the filing of the court reporter's certificate to confirm that the transcripts have been properly ordered or file a motion to order the court reporter to show cause why the reporter should not be held in contempt for failure to comply with the reporter's duty under MCR 7.210(B)(3)(a). The transcripts shall be considered timely ordered if the certificate or the motion are filed within this period.


Summaries of

Hotchkiss v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Michigan
Nov 1, 2022
No. 362370 (Mich. Ct. App. Nov. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Hotchkiss v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:Frances Hotchkiss v. Dionte Moore

Court:Court of Appeals of Michigan

Date published: Nov 1, 2022

Citations

No. 362370 (Mich. Ct. App. Nov. 1, 2022)