Opinion
2013-06-7
Richard HOTALING, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Charles M. SPROCK, Esq., Robert F. Baldwin, Jr., Esq., Jamie L. Sutphen, Esq. and Baldwin & Sutphen, LLP, Defendants–Respondents. (Appeal No. 1.)
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (James P. Murphy, J.), entered September 15, 2011. The order granted the motion of defendants for summary judgment and dismissed the third amended complaint. Costello, Cooney & Fearon, PLLC, Syracuse (Nicole Marlow–Jones of Counsel), For Plaintiff–Appellant. Smith, Sovik, Kendrick & Sugnet, P.C., Syracuse (Laurence F. Sovik of Counsel), for Defendants–Respondents.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (James P. Murphy, J.), entered September 15, 2011. The order granted the motion of defendants for summary judgment and dismissed the third amended complaint.
Costello, Cooney & Fearon, PLLC, Syracuse (Nicole Marlow–Jones of Counsel), For Plaintiff–Appellant. Smith, Sovik, Kendrick & Sugnet, P.C., Syracuse (Laurence F. Sovik of Counsel), for Defendants–Respondents.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs ( see Hughes v. Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 A.D.2d 988, 529 N.Y.S.2d 658;Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Roberts & Roberts, 63 A.D.2d 566, 567, 404 N.Y.S.2d 608;see alsoCPLR 5501[a][1] ).