Opinion
Michael S. Sorgen, LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL S. SORGEN, Berkeley, CA, Dean L. Johnson, Esq., DEAN L. JOHNSON, INC., Camano Island, WA, Attorneys for Plaintiffs.
KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General of California, SUSAN M. CARSON, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Nimrod P. Elias, Deputy Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendants.
STIPULATION AND [Proposed] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE FOR PENDING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.
On August 4, 2014, the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment in this matter. On August 14, 2014, plaintiffs filed their opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment, as well as a notice of motion and cross-motion for summary judgment. In connection with those motions, the parties agree to the following briefing and hearing schedule:
1. Defendant will file one consolidated response that will function as both the reply to Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendant's motion for summary judgment and as Defendant's opposition to Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment. It shall be filed on or before August 28, 2014, and shall be no longer than 25 pages in length.
2. Plaintiffs' reply to Defendant's opposition to Plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment shall be filed on or before September 4, 2014, and shall be no longer than 15 pages in length.
3. The hearing on all parties' motions for summary judgment shall take place on September 19, 2014, at 10:00 AM, as currently scheduled.
All parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the above-described briefing and hearing schedule.
Good cause appearing, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ordered that the parties hereto shall abide by the briefing and hearing schedule set forth above for the parties' respective motions for summary judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.