From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hosley v. Hill

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 6, 2021
2:21-cv-00362-JAM-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00362-JAM-CKD P

12-06-2021

DASHEME KAREME HOSLEY Plaintiff, v. HILL, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

By order filed June 29, 2021, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. ECF No. 7. The court granted plaintiff an additional 30 day period of time to file an amended complaint by order dated September 22, 2021. ECF No. 13. That thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Hosley v. Hill

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 6, 2021
2:21-cv-00362-JAM-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Hosley v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:DASHEME KAREME HOSLEY Plaintiff, v. HILL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 6, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-00362-JAM-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2021)