From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoskins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Aug 30, 2022
651 S.W.3d 230 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. ED 109708

08-30-2022

Maurice D. HOSKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Gwenda R. Robinson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Mo. 63101, for appellant. Dora A. Fichter, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Mo. 65102, for respondent.


Gwenda R. Robinson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Mo. 63101, for appellant.

Dora A. Fichter, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Mo. 65102, for respondent.

Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., Thomas C. Clark II, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Maurice Hoskins (Movant) appeals from an order denying his Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035. Movant argues the circuit court erroneously denied his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel because his guilty plea was rendered involuntary when counsel incorrectly advised him that he would serve no more than 25.5 to 26 years before reaching parole eligibility.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and do not find any error of law. Nor jurisdictional purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Hoskins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Aug 30, 2022
651 S.W.3d 230 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Hoskins v. State

Case Details

Full title:Maurice D. HOSKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Date published: Aug 30, 2022

Citations

651 S.W.3d 230 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)