From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoskins v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Dec 19, 2018
259 So. 3d 892 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. 4D18-2413

12-19-2018

Anthony HOSKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Anthony Hoskins, Bonifay, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. Folley, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Anthony Hoskins, Bonifay, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. Folley, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

After a fifth violation of probation, Appellant Anthony Hoskins was sentenced to 30 months in prison with 52 days of jail credit. Hoskins filed a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801 motion seeking additional jail credit for time spent in jail following previous violations of probation. The trial court summarily denied the 3.801 motion. Its order failed to attach any documents refuting Hoskins' claim. As the State concedes on appeal, this was reversible error, requiring remand.

Hoskins' motion claims that he had previously been in jail multiple times for violations of probation, but had only been awarded jail credit for the last jail stay.
--------

"Pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801(e), which incorporates Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure rule 3.850(f), the circuit court was required to attach records which conclusively refuted the defendant's motion seeking additional jail credit." Williams v. State , 141 So.3d 686, 687 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) ; Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(5) ("If the denial is based on the records in the case, a copy of that portion of the files and records that conclusively shows that the defendant is entitled to no relief shall be attached to the final order.").

As noted above, the State concedes that the trial court's order does not comply with the Rule. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing or for the attachment of records conclusively refuting Hoskins' claim for additional jail credit.

Reversed and remanded .

Gerber, C.J., Forst and Kuntz, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hoskins v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Dec 19, 2018
259 So. 3d 892 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Hoskins v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY HOSKINS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Dec 19, 2018

Citations

259 So. 3d 892 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Citing Cases

Utria v. State

Unlike a rule 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence, rule 3.801 does not place any burden on the…

Pettis v. State

See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801. Because the trial court failed to attach records conclusively refuting Pettis'…