Hoskins v. Kung

1 Citing case

  1. Harvard Steel Sales, LLC v. Bain

    188 A.D.3d 79 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)   Cited 8 times

    Because none of the parties resides in Erie County, the sole question before the trial court was whether "a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred" in Erie County (id. ). We note that plaintiff did not cross-move to retain venue in Erie County pursuant to CPLR 510 (3), and thus its averments and arguments related to the convenience of material witnesses are irrelevant (seeHoskins v. Kung , 237 A.D.2d 988, 989, 654 N.Y.S.2d 551 [4th Dept. 1997] ; Bauer v. Facilities Dev. Corp. , 210 A.D.2d 992, 992-993, 621 N.Y.S.2d 815 [4th Dept. 1994] ).