From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoskins v. City of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 16, 2000
766 So. 2d 410 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 3D00-279

Opinion filed August 16, 2000. JULY TERM, A.D. 2000

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Victoria Platzer, Judge, L.T. Nos. 94-36776, 94-36772

Derik Hoskins, in proper person.

Alejandro Vilarello, City Attorney, and George K. Wysong, III, and Myrna D. Bricker, Assistant City Attorneys, for appellees.

Before COPE, GERSTEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.


Affirmed. Mandamus is not the proper remedy for redress of Appellant Derik Hoskins' complaints. See Davis v. City of South Bay, 433 So.2d 1364 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).


Summaries of

Hoskins v. City of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 16, 2000
766 So. 2d 410 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Hoskins v. City of Miami

Case Details

Full title:DERIK HOSKINS, Appellant, v. THE CITY OF MIAMI, et al., Appellees

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Aug 16, 2000

Citations

766 So. 2d 410 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)