From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hosino v. Garrett

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 5, 2022
2:21-cv-02234-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Jan. 5, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-02234-JAD-VCF

01-05-2022

Rodney Hosino, Petitioner v. Tim Garrett, et al., Respondents


ORDER DENYING IFP APPLICATION

[ECF NO. 3]

Jermifer A. Dorsey, U.S. District Judge

Rodney Hosino petitions for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Based on the financial information provided, I find that he is able to pay the full $5.00 filing fee in this matter, so I deny his application.

ECF No. 1.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the application to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 3] is DENIED. Petitioner must have the $5.00 fee sent to the Clerk of Court by February 4, 2022, or this case will be dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to SEND petitioner two copies of this order, and petitioner must make the necessary arrangements to have one of those copies attached to the check for the filing fee.


Summaries of

Hosino v. Garrett

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 5, 2022
2:21-cv-02234-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Jan. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Hosino v. Garrett

Case Details

Full title:Rodney Hosino, Petitioner v. Tim Garrett, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 5, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-02234-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Jan. 5, 2022)