From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoshak v. Sysco Food Services of Pittsburgh, Llc.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 28, 2008
2:06cv176 Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. Jul. 28, 2008)

Opinion

2:06cv176 Electronic Filing.

July 28, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


AND NOW, this 28th day of July, 2008, after de novo review of the record and upon due consideration of the magistrate judge's report and recommendation filed on July 3, 2008, and plaintiff's objections thereto, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 34) be, and the same hereby is, granted. The report and recommendation as augmented herein is adopted as the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff's objections are without merit. Plaintiff has advanced no sound basis to distinguish Phillips v. Babcock Wilcox, 503 A.2d 36, 38 (Pa.Super. 1986), the holding of which is particularly persuasive here where plaintiff elected not to pursue to exhaustion any protection afforded under the Collective Bargaining Agreement. Similarly, plaintiff has failed to advance any persuasive grounds for recognizing a common law cause of action under the circumstances. Consequently, the entry of summary judgment in defendant's favor is appropriate.


Summaries of

Hoshak v. Sysco Food Services of Pittsburgh, Llc.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 28, 2008
2:06cv176 Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. Jul. 28, 2008)
Case details for

Hoshak v. Sysco Food Services of Pittsburgh, Llc.

Case Details

Full title:JAY HOSHAK, Plaintiff, v. SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF PITTSBURGH, LLC. Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 28, 2008

Citations

2:06cv176 Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. Jul. 28, 2008)

Citing Cases

Prater v. City of Phila.

Similarly, we are aware of no Pennsylvania common law cause of action for "retaliation" outside of a claim…