From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hosey v. Berry

Supreme Court of Michigan
Sep 15, 2006
477 Mich. 855 (Mich. 2006)

Opinion

No. 131213.

September 15, 2006.

Orders Granting Oral Argument in Cases Pending on Application for Leave to Appeal SC: 131213, COA: 257709, Oakland CC: 2003-050311-NI.


Orders Granting Oral Argument in Cases Pending on Application for Leave to Appeal September 15, 2006.

We direct the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address whether MCR 2.116(G)(6) permits a trial court, in deciding a motion for summary disposition, to consider unsworn statements or opinions of potential witnesses contained in documents that may be inadmissible at trial. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should avoid submitting mere restatements of the arguments made in their application papers. The Michigan Trial Lawyers Association and the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc., are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.


Summaries of

Hosey v. Berry

Supreme Court of Michigan
Sep 15, 2006
477 Mich. 855 (Mich. 2006)
Case details for

Hosey v. Berry

Case Details

Full title:AMELIA HOSEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHANTAY STARGHILL BERRY…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Sep 15, 2006

Citations

477 Mich. 855 (Mich. 2006)