From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hosein v. Mayorkas

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 17, 2021
21-CV-4057 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-4057 (LTS)

08-17-2021

SHARAZ HOSEIN, Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge:

By order dated July 2, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff to either tender the $402.00 in fees that are required to file a civil action in this court or submit a completed amended request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) within thirty days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. On July 26, 2021, the order was returned to the Court with a notation on the envelope indicating that the mail was not deliverable as addressed.

Plaintiff has not complied with the Court's order, has failed to notify the Court of a change of mailing address, and has not initiated any further contact with the Court, written or otherwise. Accordingly, Plaintiff's complaint, filed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hosein v. Mayorkas

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 17, 2021
21-CV-4057 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Hosein v. Mayorkas

Case Details

Full title:SHARAZ HOSEIN, Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 17, 2021

Citations

21-CV-4057 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2021)