From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horton v. Warden, Madison Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 26, 2018
CASE NO. 2:17-CV-00758 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 26, 2018)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:17-CV-00758

02-26-2018

MARKEE HORTON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, MADISON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent.



Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers OPINION AND ORDER

On January 22, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this action be sua sponte dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 6.) Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. The docket indicates that notice of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to Petitioner was returned as undeliverable, and marked "Return to Sender - Refused." Therefore, the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 6) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED for failure to prosecute.

Petitioner has failed his right to appeal by failing to file objections. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). Therefore, the Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter final judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

ALGENON L. MARBLEY

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Horton v. Warden, Madison Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 26, 2018
CASE NO. 2:17-CV-00758 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 26, 2018)
Case details for

Horton v. Warden, Madison Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:MARKEE HORTON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, MADISON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 26, 2018

Citations

CASE NO. 2:17-CV-00758 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 26, 2018)