From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horton v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
May 9, 2013
Docket no. 2:11-cr-70-GZS (D. Me. May. 9, 2013)

Opinion

Docket no. 2:11-cr-70-GZS 2:12-cv-147-GZS

05-09-2013

JULIET HORTON, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION

No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision filed May 7, 2013 (ECF No. 49) or the Supplemental Recommended Decision filed on April 19, 2013 (ECF No. 72), these Recommended Decisions are hereby AFFIRMED.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Motions to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2255 (ECF Nos. 30 & 33) are hereby DENIED.

It is also hereby ORDERED that no certificate of appealability pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 cases shall be issued should Defendant seek to appeal this order because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

SO ORDERED.

George Z. Singal

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Horton v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
May 9, 2013
Docket no. 2:11-cr-70-GZS (D. Me. May. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Horton v. United States

Case Details

Full title:JULIET HORTON, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: May 9, 2013

Citations

Docket no. 2:11-cr-70-GZS (D. Me. May. 9, 2013)