Horton v. State

Full title: Joseph HORTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Mar 17, 2020

595 S.W.3d 584 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. ED 107641

03-17-2020

Joseph HORTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

FOR APPELLANT, Maleaner Harvey, Asst. Public Defender, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101. FOR RESPONDENT, Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

PER CURIAM.

FOR APPELLANT, Maleaner Harvey, Asst. Public Defender, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

FOR RESPONDENT, Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Roy L. Richter, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Horton appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).