From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horton v. Simmons

Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE
May 11, 1897
37 A. 535 (R.I. 1897)

Opinion

May 11, 1897.

PRESENT: Matteson, C.J., Stiness and Tillinghast, JJ.

From time to time between 1869 and 1873 a married woman deposited money in a bank for the benefit of her son. Upon her death, her husband living, the son brought assumpsit against her administrator to recover the money: Held, that the coverture of the defendant's intestate was a bar to the action, and the plaintiff's remedy was by bill in equity to establish a trust and for an account.

ASSUMPSIT for money deposited for the plaintiff's benefit. Heard on the latter's petition for a new trial.

Charles H. Page and Franklin P. Owen, for plaintiff.

Simon S. Lapham, Edward D. Bassett and Robert W. Burbank, for defendant.


We think that the coverture of the defendant's intestate is a defence to the plaintiff's suit, and that his remedy is by bill in equity to establish a trust and for an account.


Summaries of

Horton v. Simmons

Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE
May 11, 1897
37 A. 535 (R.I. 1897)
Case details for

Horton v. Simmons

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES H. HORTON vs. HENRY E. SIMMONS, Administrator

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE

Date published: May 11, 1897

Citations

37 A. 535 (R.I. 1897)
20 R.I. 88