From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horton v. Indymac Federal Bank, FSB

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 17, 2010
CIV. NO. S-09-0818 GEB GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2010)

Opinion

CIV. NO. S-09-0818 GEB GGH PS.

February 17, 2010


ORDER


Defendant FDIC, as receiver for Indymac Federal Bank, has filed a motion to lift stay and set deadline to respond to complaint, which presently is calendared for hearing on February 25, 2010. Having reviewed the record, the court has determined that oral argument would not be of material assistance in determining the pending motion. Accordingly, the court will not entertain oral argument, and will determine the motion on the record, including the briefing in support of the pending motion. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 78-230(h).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The February 25, 2010 hearing on the motion to lift stay and set deadline to respond to complaint, filed January 5, 2010, is vacated; and

2. The motion is submitted on the record.


Summaries of

Horton v. Indymac Federal Bank, FSB

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 17, 2010
CIV. NO. S-09-0818 GEB GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2010)
Case details for

Horton v. Indymac Federal Bank, FSB

Case Details

Full title:SHERITA HORTON, Plaintiff, v. INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK, FSB, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 17, 2010

Citations

CIV. NO. S-09-0818 GEB GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2010)