From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horton v. Hayes Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1917
181 App. Div. 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)

Opinion

December, 1917.


Order reversed so far as it restrains defendants voting upon the stock of the Hayes Company, from voting as directors of the Hayes Company, or from voting the stock held by the Hayes Company in the Howell-Hinchman Company, but such voting may not be done in furtherance of any act otherwise forbidden in the order. Defendants enjoined from entering into any engagement in any way enlarging in time or amount any salaries or compensation to any officer or director of the Howell-Hinchman Company, or from doing any act in the management of the Howell-Hinchman Company that is not in the course of the usual business of that company. Order as so modified affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Stapleton, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Order to be settled before Mr. Justice Thomas.


Summaries of

Horton v. Hayes Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1917
181 App. Div. 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)
Case details for

Horton v. Hayes Company

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE HORTON, Respondent, v. THE HAYES COMPANY and Others, Appellants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1917

Citations

181 App. Div. 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)