From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horton v. Forty-Second Street, Manhattanville

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1897
14 App. Div. 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)

Opinion

February Term, 1897.

Present — Van Brunt, P.J., Barrett, Rumsey, O'Brien and Ingraham, JJ.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. —


Upon the facts appearing upon this motion the protection of the plaintiff does not require that a temporary injunction should be granted. The parties should be left to have their rights determined upon the trial. The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Horton v. Forty-Second Street, Manhattanville

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1897
14 App. Div. 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)
Case details for

Horton v. Forty-Second Street, Manhattanville

Case Details

Full title:Charlotte A. Horton, Appellant, v. Forty-second Street, Manhattanville and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1897

Citations

14 App. Div. 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)