From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horton v. Dominguez

Supreme Court of California
Oct 14, 1885
2 Cal. Unrep. 548 (Cal. 1885)

Opinion

          Department 2. Appeal from superior court, Ventura county. Motion to dismiss appeal under rule 2 of the supreme court, which reads as follows:

          ‘Rule 2. Transcript. The appellant in a civil action shall, within forty days after the appeal is perfected, and the bill of exceptions and the statement (if there be any) are settled, serve and file the printed transcript of the record, duly certified to be correct by the attorneys of the respective parties, or by the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken.’

          The transcript in this case was filed August 5, 1885. The notice of appeal had been filed on June 3, 1885, and the bill of exceptions was settled on July 1, 1885, and filed July 2, 1885.

         COUNSEL

          Hall & Hamer, for appellant.

          Blackstock & Shepherd, for respondents.


         OPINION

         THE COURT.

          The transcript was filed within the time prescribed by rule 2 of this court. The motion to dismiss the appeal is therefore denied.


Summaries of

Horton v. Dominguez

Supreme Court of California
Oct 14, 1885
2 Cal. Unrep. 548 (Cal. 1885)
Case details for

Horton v. Dominguez

Case Details

Full title:HORTON v. DOMINGUEZ.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 14, 1885

Citations

2 Cal. Unrep. 548 (Cal. 1885)
2 Cal. Unrep. 548