From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horton v. Dobbs

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Jan 28, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09CV114 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 28, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09CV114.

January 28, 2011


ORDER GRANTING ENLARGEMENT OF TIME


On January 26, 2011, Defendants Brenda Kimball, George Trent, John L. King, II, Lt. Wesley Dobbs, and Officer Benson, by their respective counsel, filed "Defendants' Joint Motion to Extend Dispositive Motions Deadline" [Docket Entry 155]. On January 3, 2011, this Court granted Plaintiff, pro se Roy Horton an enlargement of time to complete discovery with respect to Defendant John L, King, II, only until February 28, 2011. The deadline for dispositive motions was enlarged to February 1, 2011.

Defendants are in agreement that extending the dispositive motions deadline would be in their best interests, as Defendant King was joined in the Complaint later and his deadlines differ from the other Defendants', even though he shares counsel with Defendants Kimball and Trent. Defendants note and the Court is aware that Plaintiff has not been consulted regarding this motion, although he has been sent correspondence regarding the motion.

The Court agrees with Defendants that it is more efficient for all dispositive motions to be due at the same time, and also more efficient for all the discovery to be completed and reviewed before such motions are due. The Court also finds it in Plaintiff's best interest to enlarge his time for filing, in light of the fact that he will have more time to review late-acquired discovery from Defendant King.

The undersigned has been reluctant to grant further enlargements of time because the scheduling of the remaining dates, in particular the final pretrial conference and trial, are already on the District Court calendar. However, the undersigned believes an enlargement of time for dispositive motions is in the best interest of all concerned but advises the parties that any further amendments to the scheduling order including continuance of the final pretrial and trial dates are in the control of and will be made solely by the District Court as necessary.

For reasons apparent to the Court, "Defendants' Joint Motion to Extend Dispositive Motions Deadline" [Docket Entry 155] is GRANTED. The deadline for dispositive motions for all parties is extended to March 10, 2011. Responses to any dispositive motions shall be due March 24, 2011. Replies, if any, to responses shall be due April 5, 2011.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record, and to Roy Horton, Plaintiff pro se by Certified United States Mail.

DATED: January 28, 2011.

Exhibit


Summaries of

Horton v. Dobbs

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Jan 28, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09CV114 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Horton v. Dobbs

Case Details

Full title:ROY HORTON, Plaintiff, v. LT. WESLEY DOBBS, Marion Co. Sheriff's Dept.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Date published: Jan 28, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09CV114 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 28, 2011)