From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horton v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 9, 2020
Case No. 18-cv-13911 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 9, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 18-cv-13911

03-09-2020

TIMOTHY KEITH HORTON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.


Anthony P. Patti United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER: (1) ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE PATTI'S FEBRUARY 14, 2020 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 18); (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 17); (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 16); and (4) AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER

On February 14, 2020, Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti issued a Report and Recommendation to affirm the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security in this action challenging the Commissioner's final decision to deny Plaintiff's application for supplemental security income benefits. (ECF No. 18, R&R.)

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation and there being no timely objections under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 18), DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 16), GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 17), and AFFIRMS the findings of the Commissioner. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 9, 2020

s/Paul D. Borman

Paul D. Borman

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Horton v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 9, 2020
Case No. 18-cv-13911 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 9, 2020)
Case details for

Horton v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY KEITH HORTON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 9, 2020

Citations

Case No. 18-cv-13911 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 9, 2020)