From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horton v. Cnty. of San Diego

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Feb 7, 2022
21-cv-400-H-BGS (S.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2022)

Opinion

21-cv-400-H-BGS

02-07-2022

MICHELLE HORTON, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO PERMIT DEPOSITION TO OCCUR AFTER DISCOVERY CUTOFF [ECF 32]

Hon. Bernard G. Skomal, United States Magistrate Judge.

On January 28, 2022, the partied filed a Joint Motion seeking leave of Court to complete the noticed Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of the County after the February 8, 2022 fact discovery deadline, but no later than February 22, 2022. (ECF 32.) The Joint Motion explains the parties will not be able to complete this deposition by the February 8, 2022 fact discovery deadline because of a new topic added in late January, unavailability of certain individuals identified for certain topics, and other scheduling issues. Good cause appearing, the Joint Motion is GRANTED. The parties may complete the identified Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of the County after the February 8, 2022 fact discovery deadline, but no later than February 22, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Horton v. Cnty. of San Diego

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Feb 7, 2022
21-cv-400-H-BGS (S.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Horton v. Cnty. of San Diego

Case Details

Full title:MICHELLE HORTON, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Feb 7, 2022

Citations

21-cv-400-H-BGS (S.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2022)