From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horton v. Bay St. Louis Police Department

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division
May 17, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08cv1505HSO-JMR (S.D. Miss. May. 17, 2010)

Summary

stating “Medical Staff” is not “person” subject to suit within the meaning of § 1983

Summary of this case from Racine v. Lassalle Management

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08cv1505HSO-JMR.

May 17, 2010


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


This cause comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [23] of Chief United States Magistrate Judge John M. Roper, recommending that the Motion [16] of Defendants Reggie Smith, Warden, and the Board of Supervisors, Pearl River County, Mississippi, to Strike, be granted, and that "Pearl River County Jail" and "Medical Staff of Pearl River County Jail" should be stricken as Defendants in the instant action. No party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Where a party fails to file specific objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the district court reviews the report and recommendation for findings and conclusions that are clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989).

Plaintiff filed his pro se Complaint against Defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for the alleged denial of medical care while incarcerated at the Pearl River County Jail. See Pl.'s Compl. [1]. Section 1983 creates a cause of action against any person who, under color of state law, causes another to be deprived of a federally protected constitutional right. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By way of their Motion, Defendants sought to strike "Pearl River County Jail" and the "Medical Staff of Pearl River County Jail" as Defendants, on grounds that they were not proper parties to this lawsuit. See Defs.' Mot. to Strike [16] at p. 1. This Court notes that jails are not "persons" subject to liability under § 1983. See Miley v. Jones County Jail, No. 2:05cv2072, 2007 WL 2159334, at * 8 (S.D. Miss. July 25, 2007). Moreover, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that the "Medical Staff of Pearl River County Jail" is not subject to section 1983 actions. See Murphy v. Clarke County Jail, No. 09-0660, 2010 WL 1487872, at * 2 (S.D. Ala. March 31, 2010) ("The Nurses Department (or medical staff) at the jail is not a legal entity distinct from the jail and, therefore, it is not subject to suit, nor is it a "person" for § 1983 purposes.").

No objections having been filed, and based on the record before this Court, the undersigned finds that the Magistrate Judge's findings were not clearly erroneous, nor were his conclusions contrary to law. After referral of hearing by this Court, and having fully reviewed the Report and Recommendation [23], the relevant law, and the record in this matter, and being fully advised in the premises, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation [23] of Chief Magistrate Judge John M. Roper, should be adopted as the opinion of this Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, the Report and Recommendation [23] of Chief Magistrate Judge John M. Roper should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety as the finding of this Court.

IT IS, FURTHER, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, the Motion [16] of Defendants Reggie Smith, Warden, and the Board of Supervisors, Pearl River County, Mississippi, to Strike, should be, and hereby is, GRANTED, and Defendants "Pearl River County Jail" and "Medical Staff of Pearl River County Jail" should be, and hereby are, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 17th day of May, 2010.


Summaries of

Horton v. Bay St. Louis Police Department

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division
May 17, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08cv1505HSO-JMR (S.D. Miss. May. 17, 2010)

stating “Medical Staff” is not “person” subject to suit within the meaning of § 1983

Summary of this case from Racine v. Lassalle Management

stating "Medical Staff" is not "person" subject to suit within the meaning of § 1983

Summary of this case from Racine v. LaSalle Mgmt.

stating “Medical Staff” is not “person” subject to suit within the meaning of § 1983

Summary of this case from Nixon v. Neal
Case details for

Horton v. Bay St. Louis Police Department

Case Details

Full title:JAMES L. HORTON PLAINTIFF v. BAY ST. LOUIS POLICE DEPARTMENT, PEARL RIVER…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division

Date published: May 17, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08cv1505HSO-JMR (S.D. Miss. May. 17, 2010)

Citing Cases

Racine v. Lassalle Management

See Wetzel v. St. Tammany Par. Jail, 610 F.Supp.2d 545, 548 (E.D. La. 2009) (citing Cullen v. DuPage Ct.y,…

Racine v. LaSalle Mgmt.

See Wetzel v. St. Tammany Par. Jail, 610 F. Supp. 2d 545, 548 (E.D. La. 2009) (citing Cullen v. DuPage Ct.y,…