Horowitz v. Kushner Pines, Inc.

Full title: EDWARD HOROWITZ, Respondent, v. KUSHNER PINES, INC., Appellant

Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Nov 23, 1943

181 Misc. 10 (N.Y. App. Term 1943)

46 N.Y.S.2d 301

Opinion

November 23, 1943.

Appeal from the City Court of the City of New York, New York County, COLEMAN, J.

Herman Mendes for appellant.

Samuel Sumner Goldberg for respondent.

MEMORANDUM

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff's error in practice by failing to make a separate demand for jury trial was not curable by the nunc pro tunc order appealed from.^_

_ See, also, in the First Department, Gale v. Ryan, 180 Misc. 126, affd. 264 A.D. 754, and Transoceanic Fisheries, Inc. v. Cohen 179 Misc. 73. Cf. in the Second Department, New York Investors, Inc., v. Laurelton Homes, Inc., 230 A.D. 712; Whitton Automotive Parts Co. v. Yale Electric Corp., 231 A.D. 836, and Dixon v. Title Guarantee and Trust Co., 264 A.D. 739. — [REP.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

HAMMER, SCHMUCK and HECHT, JJ., concur.