From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horowitz v. Hamburg American Packet Co.

Supreme Court — Appellate Term
Oct 1, 1896
18 Misc. 728 (N.Y. App. Term 1896)

Opinion

October, 1896.

J.J. Frank, for motion.

Mashbir Cukor, opposed.


We consider that the point in respect to which the justices of this term differed, viz., whether the question of permanent injuries should have been submitted to the jury in the absence of the evidence of medical experts, is of sufficient importance to justify the granting of the motion.

Motion granted upon condition that the appellant files a stipulation that for the purpose of such appeal it will waive all objections to the judgment except those which raised that point.

Present: DALY, P.J., McADAM and BISCHOFF, JJ.

Motion granted.


Summaries of

Horowitz v. Hamburg American Packet Co.

Supreme Court — Appellate Term
Oct 1, 1896
18 Misc. 728 (N.Y. App. Term 1896)
Case details for

Horowitz v. Hamburg American Packet Co.

Case Details

Full title:ISABELLA HOROWITZ, Respondent, v . THE HAMBURG AMERICAN PACKET CO.…

Court:Supreme Court — Appellate Term

Date published: Oct 1, 1896

Citations

18 Misc. 728 (N.Y. App. Term 1896)