From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horowitch v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 11, 1969
33 A.D.2d 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

December 11, 1969

Appeal from the Court of Claims.

Present — Goldman, P.J., Del Vecchio, Gabrielli, Moule and Bastow, JJ.


Judgment unanimously modified by increasing the award to $28,675 and as modified affirmed. Memorandum: Claimant appeals from the award on the ground that his claim for the value of the millwork and counter fixtures, which was assigned to him by the tenant, should have been allowed. The State concedes that the court should have increased the award by $13,500, the amount asserted by claimant, and agrees that the amount of the award should be $28,675 with interest. This modification, the State argues "should be made, however, only in the event that the award for the structure is modified downward." The claim for the structure is a separate and independent matter which is in no way dependent upon the assigned claim for the value of the fixtures. It is clear that the value of the millwork and counter fixtures was inadvertently omitted and should have been allowed.


Summaries of

Horowitch v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 11, 1969
33 A.D.2d 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Horowitch v. State

Case Details

Full title:SHELDON J. HOROWITCH, as Assignee of Marine Midland Trust Company of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 11, 1969

Citations

33 A.D.2d 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)