From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horob v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 11, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-03090-LTB (D. Colo. Jan. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-03090-BNB

01-11-2013

TODD HOROB, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN GARCIA, and JUDGE RICHARD F. CEBULL, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, Todd Horob, is a federal prisoner in Colorado. Mr. Horob initiated this action by filing pro se a Complaint (ECF No. 1). On November 28, 2012, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland entered an order directing Mr. Horob to cure certain deficiencies if he wished to pursue any claims in this action. More specifically, Magistrate Judge Boland ordered Mr. Horob to file an amended pleading on the proper form and to file a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 along with a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement and a signed authorization allowing the Bureau of Prisons to calculate and disburse filing fee payments from his inmate account. Mr. Horob was warned that the action would be dismissed without further notice if he failed to cure the deficiencies within thirty days.

On December 14, 2012, Mr. Horob submitted for filing a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement. However, Mr. Horob has failed within the time allowed to file on the proper forms a Prisoner Complaint and a Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and he has failed to submit a signed authorization allowing the Bureau of Prisons to calculate and disburse filing fee payments from his inmate account. Therefore, the action will be dismissed for failure to cure all of the deficiencies.

Furthermore, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status will be denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). If Plaintiff files a notice of appeal he also must pay the full $455 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Complaint and the action are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Mr. Horob failed to cure all of the deficiencies as directed. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 11th day of January, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

_______________

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Horob v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 11, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-03090-LTB (D. Colo. Jan. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Horob v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

Case Details

Full title:TODD HOROB, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN GARCIA, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jan 11, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-03090-LTB (D. Colo. Jan. 11, 2013)