From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hornstein v. Perry

Supreme Court, New York County
May 3, 1933
147 Misc. 826 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1933)

Opinion

May 3, 1933.

Hornstein Hornstein [ George D. Hornstein and Abraham Hornstein of counsel], for the motion.

Brodek, Raphael Eisner [ Charles A. Brodek and Louis P. Eisner of counsel], for Reading Times Publishing Company and John H. Perry, opposed.


The equitable counterclaims in the actions upon the notes are entitled to be tried on the equity side of the court ( Golran Realty Corp. v. Butler Grocery Co., 230 A.D. 661), as is the action for the dissolution of the alleged partnership. An action in equity may be consolidated with one at law. ( Gianopoulos v. New York Bankers, Inc., 234 A.D. 682; Goldey v. Bierman, 201 id. 527.) The motion to consolidate actions is accordingly granted upon the following conditions: (1) That in the event that the equitable counterclaims are determined adversely to the plaintiff in the dissolution action, the other issues in the actions upon the notes are to be tried before a jury and the plaintiffs in the note actions are to have the right to open and close; and (2) that the consolidated action be set down for trial at Special Term, Part 3, of this court, on the 22d day of May, 1933.


Summaries of

Hornstein v. Perry

Supreme Court, New York County
May 3, 1933
147 Misc. 826 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1933)
Case details for

Hornstein v. Perry

Case Details

Full title:I. JOE HORNSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. JOHN H. PERRY, Defendant. READING TIMES…

Court:Supreme Court, New York County

Date published: May 3, 1933

Citations

147 Misc. 826 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1933)
265 N.Y.S. 59